What are the Powers of High Court?
Inherent powers of the High Court. Under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the inherent power of High Court is peculiar in criminal jurisprudence. It is the most powerful weapon for the High Court to clear the province of criminal law jurisdiction of all vitiating and malicious influences.
In the following cases, the inherent power of the High
Court could be exercised to quash the proceedings-
1. Where
there is a legal bar against the institution or continuance of the proceedings.
2. Where the
allegation in the first information report (FIR)
or complaint does not constitute the offence alleged.
3. Where
there is no legal evidence adduced in support of the charge or the evidence
adduced clearly or failed to prove the charge.
The above list of points is not exhaustive. High court
may exercise its inherent power in other situations as well, to serve the ends
of justice.
In Divine Retreat Centre vs. State of Kerala,
SC 2008, the Supreme Court held that there are three circumstances under
which the inherent jurisdiction under section 482 of CrPC may be exercised-
1. To give effect to an order under the code.
2. To prevent abuse of the process of the courts.
3. To otherwise secure the ends of justice.
Cannot Order Stay of Arrest
In the case of, Ashok Kumar Singh vs. State of
Bihar CrLT SC 1993, the Supreme Court held that the High Court, while
exercising its jurisdiction under section 482, cannot order stay of arrest of
accused during the investigation.
Investigation after Charge Sheet
In the case of, State of Punjab vs. CBI and
others, SC 2011, the Supreme Court held that fresh investigation or re-investigation
after the filing of charge sheet by police can be ordered by High Court under
section 482 of CrPC to secure the ends of justice. Further held that inherent
powers of the High Court are not limited or affected by section 173(8).
Cancellation of Bail by High Court
For the ends of justice, the High Court may order for
the cancellation of bail using its inherent powers under section 482.
Quashing of FIR by High Court
In the case of, D.C Jain vs. UOI, 1994,
Punjab and Haryana High Court: The allegation in FIR prima facie constituted
the offence of cheating, and a civil suit was also pending in respect of the
same offence. It was held that the pendency of civil suit is no ground for
quashing the FIR.
Quashing of charge → Yes
Quashing of charge sheet → Yes
Quashing FIR on Account of Delay
It was held in case of, Jagdish Ram vs. the
State of Rajasthan that, FIR does not deserve to be quashed by the
High Court in the exercise of power under section 482 of the code
merely on account of delay.
Good article by my friend and colleague. Great job buddy.
ReplyDeleteGood article about the high courts powers u/s 482 crpc. All the best.
ReplyDeleteGood one
ReplyDelete