What are the Powers of High Court? 



Inherent powers of the High Court. Under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the inherent power of High Court is peculiar in criminal jurisprudence. It is the most powerful weapon for the High Court to clear the province of criminal law jurisdiction of all vitiating and malicious influences. 


In the following cases, the inherent power of the High Court could be exercised to quash the proceedings-

1. Where there is a legal bar against the institution or continuance of the proceedings.

2. Where the allegation in the first information report (FIR) or complaint does not constitute the offence alleged.  

3. Where there is no legal evidence adduced in support of the charge or the evidence adduced clearly or failed to prove the charge.

The above list of points is not exhaustive. High court may exercise its inherent power in other situations as well, to serve the ends of justice.


When to Use Inherent Power

In Divine Retreat Centre vs. State of Kerala, SC 2008, the Supreme Court held that there are three circumstances under which the inherent jurisdiction under section 482 of CrPC may be exercised-

1.   To give effect to an order under the code.

2.   To prevent abuse of the process of the courts.

3.   To otherwise secure the ends of justice.


 

Cannot Order Stay of Arrest

In the case of, Ashok Kumar Singh vs. State of Bihar CrLT SC 1993, the Supreme Court held that the High Court, while exercising its jurisdiction under section 482, cannot order stay of arrest of accused during the investigation.

Investigation after Charge Sheet

In the case of, State of Punjab vs. CBI and others, SC 2011, the Supreme Court held that fresh investigation or re-investigation after the filing of charge sheet by police can be ordered by High Court under section 482 of CrPC to secure the ends of justice. Further held that inherent powers of the High Court are not limited or affected by section 173(8).

Cancellation of Bail by High Court

For the ends of justice, the High Court may order for the cancellation of bail using its inherent powers under section 482.

Quashing of FIR by High Court

In the case of, D.C Jain vs. UOI, 1994, Punjab and Haryana High Court: The allegation in FIR prima facie constituted the offence of cheating, and a civil suit was also pending in respect of the same offence. It was held that the pendency of civil suit is no ground for quashing the FIR.

Quashing of charge → Yes

Quashing of charge sheet → Yes

 

Quashing FIR on Account of Delay

It was held in case of, Jagdish Ram vs. the State of Rajasthan that, FIR does not deserve to be quashed by the High Court in the exercise of power under section 482 of the code merely on account of delay.

 


Comments

  1. Good article by my friend and colleague. Great job buddy.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good article about the high courts powers u/s 482 crpc. All the best.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Admissibility of Electronic Records as Evidence in India

Supreme Court judgment on daughters’ right to ancestral property